TERITORI ADAPTIF RUMAH JOGLO SEBAGAI POTENSI WISATA BUDAYA DESA KEJI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61696/juparita.v4i3.1181Keywords:
Joglo House, Adaptive Territory, Outdoor Space, Cultural Tourism, TogethernessAbstract
The former village head’s joglo house in Keji Village, Muntilan, is a vernacular architectural heritage site that still preserves social and cultural values, although its outdoor space is now fenced off. This phenomenon is important because a physically bounded space continues to be used by residents for passage, interaction, activities, and collective memory. This study employed a qualitative case study using field observation, visual documentation, and in-depth interviews with occupants and residents who understand the house's history. The data were analyzed descriptively and thematically using categories of physical adaptation, function, meaning, territory, social openness, and togetherness. The findings show that the fence does not merely close off the space but serves as a device for marking boundaries, protecting family assets, and regulating access. The yard and pendopo have shifted from communal-public spaces into selectively open semi-public spaces. The study conceptualizes socially adaptive territory and argues for its relevance to the interpretation of community-based cultural tourism.
References
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Brooks/Cole.
Aulia, A. N. (2024). Exploring Indonesia's vernacular architecture: Comparison and transformation. Koridor, 3(2), 45-56.
Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Habraken, N. J. (1998). The structure of the ordinary: Form and control in the built environment. MIT Press.
Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kebudayaan Jawa. Balai Pustaka.
Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, A. D., Tran, Q. B., & Le, A. T. (2019). Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in Southeast Asia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 18(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2019.1598432
Oliver, P. (2003). Dwellings: The vernacular house worldwide. Phaidon Press.
Prijotomo, J. (1995). Arsitektur Nusantara: Menuju keniscayaan arsitektur Indonesia. Wastu Lanas Grafika.
Rapoport, A. (1969). House form and culture. Prentice Hall.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Sage Publications.
Santosa, R. B. (2000). Omah: Membaca makna rumah Jawa. Bentang.
Saraswati, R. D., & Kiswari, M. D. N. (2019). Pagar dari teritori menjadi pride dan identitas. Jurnal Tuturrupa: Jurnal Desain Komunikasi Visual dan Media Baru, 1(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.24167/tuturrupa.v1i2.1949
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Tipple, G. (2000). Extending themselves: User-initiated transformations of government-built housing in developing countries. Liverpool University Press.
Uysal Urey, Z. C. (2023). Creation of a new vernacular architecture and the contemporary adaptation. Sustainability, 15(3), 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032643
Wiryomartono, B. (1995). The tradition of dwelling: A comparative study of traditional houses in Java. Singapore University Press.
Xu, Y., Zhou, S., & Li, X. (2024). Research on the sustainable design strategies of vernacular architecture in Southwest Hubei. PLOS ONE, 19(4), e0316518.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Damiana Nestri Kiswari, Rosalia Rachma Rihadiani, Ratih Dian Saraswati, Andhika Anugrah Febrianto, Denny Putra Setiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Alamat
Email
Tlp/Wa
Instagram